<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
         xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
         xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
         xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">




    



<channel rdf:about="http://www.se.cs.put.poznan.pl/search_rss">
  <title>PUT Software Engineering Team</title>
  <link>http://www.se.cs.put.poznan.pl</link>
  
  <description>
    
            These are the search results for the query, showing results 1 to 9.
        
  </description>
  
  
  
  
  <image rdf:resource="http://www.se.cs.put.poznan.pl/logo.png"/>

  <items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.se.cs.put.poznan.pl/knowledge-base/software-projects-database/use-case-based-effort-estimation/use-case-based-effort-estimation-database-uceedb"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.se.cs.put.poznan.pl/publications/mochodek2010ucp"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.se.cs.put.poznan.pl/knowledge-base/software-engineering-blog/garmus-function-point-analysis"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.se.cs.put.poznan.pl/knowledge-base/software-engineering-blog/ucp"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.se.cs.put.poznan.pl/knowledge-base/software-engineering-blog/se-demystifying-the-black-art-book"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.se.cs.put.poznan.pl/knowledge-base/software-engineering-blog/enhancing-use-case-based-effort-estimation-with-transaction-types"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.se.cs.put.poznan.pl/knowledge-base/forum-english/software-cost-estimation"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.se.cs.put.poznan.pl/knowledge-base/forum-english/szacowanie-pracoch142onnosci"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.se.cs.put.poznan.pl/publications/ochodek-2008"/>
        
    </rdf:Seq>
  </items>

</channel>

    <item rdf:about="http://www.se.cs.put.poznan.pl/knowledge-base/software-projects-database/use-case-based-effort-estimation/use-case-based-effort-estimation-database-uceedb">        <title>Use-case-based effort estimation database (UCEEDB)</title>        <link>http://www.se.cs.put.poznan.pl/knowledge-base/software-projects-database/use-case-based-effort-estimation/use-case-based-effort-estimation-database-uceedb</link>        <description>The goal of UCEEDB is to collect use-case-based requirements specification and actual effort from real software projects. It enables calibration of effort estimation methods that relay on use-case-based functional size measurement (FSM), such as Use Case Points, Transactions, and TTPoints.</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>mochodek</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>effort estimation</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>use case points</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>ttpoints</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>benchmark</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>metrics</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>use-case transaction</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2011-04-06T17:27:11Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Rich document</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2010.10.005">        <title>Simplifying effort estimation based on Use Case Points</title>        <link>http://www.se.cs.put.poznan.pl/publications/mochodek2010ucp</link>        <description>Context: The Use Case Points (UCP) method can be used to estimate software development effort based on a use-case model and two sets of adjustment factors relating to the environmental and technical complexity of a project. The question arises whether all of these components are important from the effort estimation point of view.  Objective: This paper investigates the construction of UCP in order to find possible ways of simplifying it.  Method: The cross-validation procedure was used to compare the accuracy of the different variants of UCP (with and without the investigated simplifications). The analysis was based on data derived from a set of 14 projects for which effort ranged from 277 to 3593 man-hours. In addition, the factor analysis was performed to investigate the possibility of reducing the number of adjustment factors.  Results: The two variants of UCP - with and without unadjusted actor weights (UAW) provided similar prediction accuracy. In addition, a minor influence of the adjustment factors on the accuracy of UCP was observed. The results of the factor analysis indicated that the number of adjustment factors could be reduced from 21 to 6 (2 environmental factors and 4 technical complexity factors). Another observation was made that the variants of UCP calculated based on steps were slightly more accurate than the variants calculated based on transactions. Finally, a recently proposed use-case-based size metric TTPoints provided better accuracy than any of the investigated variants of UCP.  Conclusion: The observation in this study was that the UCP method could be simplified by rejecting UAW; calculating UCP based on steps instead of transactions; or just counting the total number of steps in use cases. Moreover, two recently proposed use-case-based size metrics Transactions and TTPoints could be used as an alternative to UCP to estimate effort at the early stages of software development.</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>mochodek</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>effort estimation</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>use case points</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>ttpoints</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>use-case transaction</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2015-09-14T11:44:49Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Article Reference</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.se.cs.put.poznan.pl/knowledge-base/software-engineering-blog/garmus-function-point-analysis">        <title>Review of book: Function Point Analysis: Measurement Practices for Successful Software Projects</title>        <link>http://www.se.cs.put.poznan.pl/knowledge-base/software-engineering-blog/garmus-function-point-analysis</link>        <description>This is a must-have book  for anyone who is seriously interested in counting IFPUG FPA and does not have access to official IFPUG counting practices manual.</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>mochodek</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>metrics</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>effort estimation</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>review</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>function point analysis</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2010-09-04T11:48:56Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Blog Entry</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.se.cs.put.poznan.pl/knowledge-base/software-engineering-blog/ucp">        <title>Use Case Points</title>        <link>http://www.se.cs.put.poznan.pl/knowledge-base/software-engineering-blog/ucp</link>        <description>The Use Case Points (UCP) method, proposed by Gustav Karner can be used to estimate effort early in the project life-cycle, with relatively low cost. It is based on two main inputs which are actors complexity, measured based on the interface actor uses to communicate with the system; and use-case complexity measured in the number of so-called transactions in use-case scenarios. Here, I would like to present you  basic information about the original method proposed by Karner.</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>mochodek</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>effort estimation</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>use case points</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>metrics</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>use cases</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>use-case transaction</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2010-09-01T10:12:30Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Blog Entry</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.se.cs.put.poznan.pl/knowledge-base/software-engineering-blog/se-demystifying-the-black-art-book">        <title>Review of book: Software Estimation Demystifying the Black Art</title>        <link>http://www.se.cs.put.poznan.pl/knowledge-base/software-engineering-blog/se-demystifying-the-black-art-book</link>        <description>Steve McConell's book is one of the best book concerning software cost estimation available on the market. In my opinion it could be especially valuable for beginners in that field, however advanced users will also find plenty of valuable information there.</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>mochodek</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>effort estimation</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>review</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2009-12-06T15:04:16Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Blog Entry</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.se.cs.put.poznan.pl/knowledge-base/software-engineering-blog/enhancing-use-case-based-effort-estimation-with-transaction-types">        <title>Enhancing Use-Case-Based Effort Estimation with Transaction Types (presentation)</title>        <link>http://www.se.cs.put.poznan.pl/knowledge-base/software-engineering-blog/enhancing-use-case-based-effort-estimation-with-transaction-types</link>        <description>Recently we have conducted some research regarding use-case-based effort estimation. Results were presented at CEE-SET'09 conference. If you would like to read how knowledge about use-case transactions semantics can help in estimating effort, go ahead and see the presentation. If you like the idea you can find more information in the paper.</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>mochodek</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>effort estimation</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>use case points</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>ttpoints</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>requirements engineering</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>use cases</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>use-case transaction</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2010-09-04T11:21:15Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Blog Entry</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.se.cs.put.poznan.pl/knowledge-base/forum-english/software-cost-estimation">        <title>Software Cost Estimation (English)</title>        <link>http://www.se.cs.put.poznan.pl/knowledge-base/forum-english/software-cost-estimation</link>        <description>Here you can discuss all topics related to the size, effort estimation</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>mochodek</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>effort estimation</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2009-10-16T12:26:06Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Forum</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.se.cs.put.poznan.pl/knowledge-base/forum-english/szacowanie-pracoch142onnosci">        <title>Szacowanie pracochłonności (Polish)</title>        <link>http://www.se.cs.put.poznan.pl/knowledge-base/forum-english/szacowanie-pracoch142onnosci</link>        <description>Tutaj możesz podyskutować na tematy związane z szacowaniem rozmiaru oprogramowania i pracochłonności</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>mochodek</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>effort estimation</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2009-10-16T12:25:55Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Forum</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85279-7_5">        <title>Automatic Transactions Identification in Use Cases</title>        <link>http://www.se.cs.put.poznan.pl/publications/ochodek-2008</link>        <description>Since the early 90's of the previous century, use cases have became informal industry standard for presenting functional requirements. The rapid popularity growth stimulated many different approaches for their presentation and writing styles. Unfortunately, this variability makes automatic processing of use cases very difficult. This problem might be mitigated by the use of transaction concept, which is defined as an atomic part of the use case scenario.   In this paper we present approach to the automatic transaction discovery in the textual use cases, through the NLP analysis. The proposed solution was implemented as a prototype tool  UCTD  and preliminarily verified in a case study. </description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>mochodek</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>effort estimation</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>use case points</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>requirements engineering</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>natural language processing</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>use cases</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>use-case transaction</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2009-09-08T06:25:23Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Inproceedings Reference</dc:type>    </item>



</rdf:RDF>
